Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012 Mar
15;
5(1):72-77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/MJMS.1957-5773.2012.0201
Basic Science
Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture
Ana Kaftandzieva1, Zhaklina Cekovska1, Igor
Kaftandziev2, Milena Petrovska1, Nikola Panovski1
1Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Medical Faculty,
Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; 2University Clinic of
Traumatology, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Aim: To determine the most common bacteria isolated from wound
specimens and to compare those culture results to Gram stain slides.
Material and methods: A total of 1970 specimens from 1788 patients,
treated in the University Clinics in Skopje during a one year period were
examined by standard microbiology techniques (inoculation onto standard agar
media and direct Gram-stained smears). Automatized Vitek system was used for
identification of all anaerobes.
Results: Out of a total of 1970 specimens, 1094 (55.5 %) were
positive by culture. A total of 1462 strains were isolated: 753 Gram
positive (Gram+), 661 Gram negative (Gram-) and 48 anaerobic bacteria. The
number of specimens yielding one, two or more different strains was 788, 244
and 62, respectively. Gram + bacteria, in 44.7 % of positive samples were a
single isolate. The most commonly isolated potential pathogen was
Staphylococcus. In 23.7% samples, Gram negative bacteria were a single
isolate (E. coli was the most common isolate). 1094 specimens were positive
by culture, 419 (38.3%) were positive by both culture and Gram stain and 675
(61.7%) were negative by Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 276
specimens). 876 specimens were negative by culture, 789 (90%) were negative
by both culture and Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 271 specimen) and
87 (9.9%) were positive only by Gram stain.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated only a 38.3 % of microbiological
correlation between Gram stain and culture. This data makes the clinical
utility of Gram stain for the microbiological analysis of wounds
questionable.
..................
Citation: Kaftandzieva A, Cekovska Zh, Kaftandziev I, Petrovska M,
Panovski N. Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain
Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture. Maced J Med Sci. 2012 Mar 15;
5(1):72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/MJMS.1957-5773.2012.0201.
Key words: wound, Gram stain slide.
Correspondence: Ana Kaftandzieva. Institute of Microbiology and
Parasitology, Medical Faculty, University “Ss Cyril and Methodius”, 50
Divizija No. 6 , 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Tel: ++ 389 2 3109829,
Fax: ++ 389 2 3214317. E-mail: akaftandzieva@yahoo.com
Received: 25-Sep-2011; Revised: 05-Dec-2011; Accepted: 14-Dec-2011; Online
first: 27-Feb-2012
Copyright: © 2012 Kaftandzieva A. This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing
interests exist.
|
<
Previous
| Next Article >
Table of contents
This Article
(free)
Abstract
Full text (html)
Full text (pdf)
Full text OnlineFirst (pdf)
Citations
- DOAJ
- Index Copernicus
- Socol@r
Google Scholar
-
Kaftandzieva A
-
Cekovska Zh
-
Kaftandziev I
-
Petrovska M
-
Panovski N
PubMed
-
Kaftandzieva A
- Cekovska Zh
- Kaftandziev I
- Petrovska M
- Panovski N
|